Huang says Nvidia can grow about 70% next year — and cybersecurity is AI's next big market
On September 10, 2026, Nvidia CEO Jensen Huang reiterated at the Goldman Sachs Communacopia + Technology Conference that he is confident the company can deliver about 70% revenue growth next year, and said cybersecurity is likely to become AI's next major growth area. In the same appearance he made Nvidia's product logic blunter than usual: it is no longer selling individual GPUs but complete AI factory infrastructure, and the pricing has moved up accordingly — the upcoming Vera Rubin platform at roughly $40,000, Blackwell at about $25,000 and Hopper at about $18,000. He also pointed to Nvidia's relationship with Anthropic, saying the chipmaker is gaining business with the Claude developer after investing in November 2025, and named robotics and autonomous driving as additional growth areas for the next several years. Two days later, on September 12, he pushed back in the same venue against criticism that the AI buildout is circularly financed.
Start with the weight of that 70% figure. Huang is talking about roughly 70% revenue growth in the next fiscal year, and it comes on top of an already enormous base. The justification is a single sentence: demand for AI compute continues to outpace available capacity. That sentence has been repeated for two years, but the context is different this time — it lands just as the market has begun doubting the returns on AI capital spending. The data-center debate has been running for months: tech companies are pouring vast sums into AI infrastructure while actual profits lag the investment, and the AI bubble narrative has taken hold. Huang's response is not to argue about demand but to move the conversation from chip prices to utilization: Nvidia executives argue their systems have long-lasting value because of high utilization and favourable economics, with financing partnerships involving financial firms supporting adoption.
The second judgement worth remembering is the market he names as next: cybersecurity. This matters more than it sounds, because it pushes AI commercialization past productivity tools like code and copy into offence and defence — a domain with extremely strong, recurring willingness to pay. The logic is not hard to follow: if frontier models are already capable of finding and exploiting real software vulnerabilities, the same capabilities will necessarily be used to defend. Third-party evaluators have been observing the same trend; assessing frontier models' actual ability to discover and exploit vulnerabilities is one of the focus areas for organizations like METR. For enterprise and government buyers this creates a new purchasing rationale — not what AI lets you do, but what it stops others from doing to you. Huang also listed robotics and autonomous driving as incremental directions for the next several years, and that physical-AI thread connects neatly with Hyundai Motor Group's autonomous driving data flywheel strategy announced the same day.
The third piece is pricing — and it is the detail that best reveals Nvidia's strategy shift. Vera Rubin at roughly $40,000, Blackwell at about $25,000, Hopper at about $18,000: those three tiers trace a clear upward curve. What they track is not a linear gain in chip performance but a change in the unit of sale — from selling accelerator cards to selling a complete AI factory system. For Nvidia that has two consequences. Order sizes and software lock-in both rise; and the defensive surface narrows — once you are not one link in a supply chain but the general contractor for a customer's AI infrastructure, the customer's switching cost becomes your moat. Huang also singled out the Anthropic relationship: Nvidia invested in the company in November 2025 and is now gaining business from it. That combination of investment plus supply has become a standard play in today's AI chip competition.
Finally, there is his answer on circular financing, the line that travelled furthest: invest $1 and get $100 back — if that is circular financing, we will do more of it. The backstory is that as Nvidia increasingly invests in and buys from cloud providers and model companies, observers question whether this mutual funding loop amplifies risk and eventually manufactures phantom demand. Huang did not dodge it at the Goldman conference; he redefined it as a normal form of capital leverage. The market reaction shows up in analyst moves: on September 13 Piper Sandler initiated coverage of five AI chip stocks — Nvidia, Broadcom, AMD, Arm and Marvell — all at overweight, on the argument that both Nvidia and Broadcom are poised for strong revenue growth driven by insatiable demand for AI compute. The same batch of research also carried the opposite view: Nvidia's share price has lagged the triple-digit gains clocked by AMD and Intel this year, which turns valuation into a catch-up argument. Bulls and bears are ultimately arguing about one variable — whether this capex cycle converts into durable revenue.
🤔 Frequently Asked Questions
Q1: Which period does the 70% growth refer to?
As stated at the Goldman conference, it is the revenue growth expected in the next fiscal year, and Huang said he is confident, because demand for AI compute continues to outpace available capacity. The supporting logic he offered was not order numbers but system utilization and economics — moving the discussion from how many chips are sold to how fully customers run them. That is worth noting: when a growth projection rests on utilization of the installed base, it ultimately depends on downstream revenue actually materializing.
Q2: What price basis is the $40,000 Vera Rubin figure?
Reports describe it as platform pricing, set alongside Blackwell at about $25,000 and Hopper at about $18,000, forming a price ladder that climbs with each generation. The point is less the specific number than the change in what is being sold — from individual graphics processors to complete AI infrastructure systems. That is what Nvidia means by the AI factory route: customers buy not parts but the full capability to run training and inference.
Q3: What exactly is the circular financing worry?
The core worry is the authenticity of demand: if a chipmaker invests in a customer and the customer spends that money buying chips, part of the reported demand growth may be self-created rather than generated by external end markets. Huang's response is to frame it as a normal form of capital leverage, invoking a $1-in, $100-back return multiple. There is no simple answer to the argument; the test remains whether that compute eventually generates revenue in real businesses.
Q4: Why would cybersecurity be AI's next big market?
Because the capability cuts both ways. Frontier models can already find and exploit real software vulnerabilities, and the same capabilities applied to defence create a recurring purchasing rationale. Compared with tools for code or copy, security budgets are rigid — not efficiency spending but mandatory spending. That also explains why Huang grouped cybersecurity with robotics and autonomous driving rather than with productivity applications: all three map to industry-level markets with high barriers, long cycles and stable budgets.
🛠️ Recommended Tools
- Unit Converter - When reading compute, power and investment figures for data centers, normalize units before comparing so magnitude tricks don't fool you
- JSON Formatter - When pulling market or earnings data to check the price ladder and revenue basis yourself, expand the JSON into a tree so field relationships are obvious
- Word Counter - When paraphrasing an executive's words, use a word count to keep the rewrite proportionate instead of inflating one reply into a full stance analysis
The thing to watch here is not the 70% figure but the fact that he anchored his defence on utilization. Demand is insatiable has been said for two years and the market is tired of it; utilization is different — it shifts the question from can you sell it to are they running it well, which ties Nvidia's growth projection to customers' actual revenue. If customers cannot keep the systems busy, the utilization story does not hold for long. The other interesting detail is the price ladder: $40k, $25k, $18k reads almost like a résumé of Nvidia's move from parts supplier to general contractor. The upside of being the contractor is deeper lock-in; the downside is that once a customer starts questioning the return on the whole investment, you are no longer one link in the supply chain — you are the party whose entire proposal gets scrutinized.
Summary
On September 10, 2026, Nvidia CEO Jensen Huang reiterated at the Goldman Sachs Communacopia + Technology Conference his confidence in roughly 70% revenue growth next fiscal year, citing AI compute demand that continues to outpace available capacity. He said cybersecurity is likely to become AI's next major growth market and named robotics and autonomous driving as later incremental areas. He disclosed the full-stack AI factory pricing ladder — the upcoming Vera Rubin at about $40,000, Blackwell at about $25,000 and Hopper at about $18,000 — showing Nvidia's shift from selling individual GPUs to supplying complete AI infrastructure systems. He noted Nvidia is gaining business from Anthropic after investing in November 2025. On September 12 he pushed back on circular-financing criticism, saying invest $1 and get $100 back — if that is circular financing, we will do more of it. On the market side, Piper Sandler initiated coverage on September 13 of five AI chip stocks (Nvidia, Broadcom, AMD, Arm, Marvell), all at overweight, while other analysts noted Nvidia's share price has lagged the triple-digit gains of AMD and Intel this year. Primary sources: Seeking Alpha, TradingView/GuruFocus, The Daily Star (AFP), BigGo Finance and The Motley Fool.
Sources: Seeking Alpha · TradingView / GuruFocus · The Daily Star (AFP) · BigGo Finance · The Motley Fool